<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Standing Watch &#187; amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://standingwatch.net/tag/amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://standingwatch.net</link>
	<description>Challenging the Powers That Be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Texans Ban Marriage, in 2005?</title>
		<link>http://standingwatch.net/2009/11/19/texans-ban-marriage-in-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://standingwatch.net/2009/11/19/texans-ban-marriage-in-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CA_Medicine_Woman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Goverment and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bigotry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heterosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radnofsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standingwatch.net/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would appear, in the race to add constitutional amendments to prevent LGBT persons from becoming equal with their heteronormative counterparts, that Texas, as usual, took some fairly extreme measures.  Because, in that effort to keep inequality legal, 22 words brought LGBT Texans much closer to equality than heteronormative Texans would have guessed, or wanted. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://standingwatch.net/2009/11/19/texans-ban-marriage-in-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
